Mumbai Indians Mumbai Indians
  • w
  • w
  • w
  • l
  • l
166-6 ( 18.1)
166-6 162-5 MUM won by 4 wickets (with ...
Sunrisers Hyderabad Sunrisers
  • l
  • w
  • l
  • l
  • l
162-5 ( 20)
Started: 02 PM, Thu Apr 17 2025 Indian Premier League Venue: Wankhede Stadium
Prev Mumbai Indians MUM Next
Prev Sunrisers SRH Next

Commentary

  • 0' The match was played in Indian Premier League on Thursday April 17.

Sunrisers

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
A. Sharma 40 28 0 7 0 143.0
H. Klaasen b J. Bumrah 37 28 0 3 2 132.0
T. Head c M. Santner b W. Jacks 28 29 0 3 0 97.0
N. Kumar Reddy c T. Varma b T. Boult 19 21 0 1 0 90.0
A. Verma Not Out 18 8 0 0 2 225.0
. Cummins Not Out 8 4 0 0 1 200.0
I. Kishan st R. Rickelton b W. Jacks 2 3 0 0 0 67.0

Fall of wickets: 1-59 (A. Sharma, 7.3 ov), 2-68 (I. Kishan, 8.4 ov), 3-82 (T. Head, 11.1 ov), 4-113 (N. Kumar Reddy, 16.4 ov), 5-136 (H. Klaasen, 18.1 ov)

Extras: Byes: 1, Legbyes: 0, Wides: 8, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
D. Chahar 4.0 0 47 0 11.75
T. Boult 4.0 0 29 1 7.25
J. Bumrah 4.0 0 21 1 5.25
W. Jacks 3.0 0 14 2 4.67
H. Pandya 4.0 0 42 1 10.5
M. Santner 1.0 0 8 0 8.0

Mumbai Indians

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
W. Jacks c Z. Ansari b . Cummins 36 26 0 3 2 138.0
R. Rickelton c T. Head b H. Patel 31 23 0 5 0 135.0
R. Sharma c T. Head b . Cummins 26 16 0 0 3 163.0
S. Yadav c Z. Ansari b . Cummins 26 15 0 2 2 173.0
T. Varma Not Out 21 17 0 2 0 124.0
H. Pandya c I. Kishan b E. Malinga 21 9 0 3 1 233.0
N. Dhir Lbw Out 0 3 0 0 0 0.0
M. Santner Not Out 0 1 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-32 (R. Sharma, 3.5 ov), 2-69 (R. Rickelton, 7.5 ov), 3-121 (S. Yadav , 12.4 ov), 4-128 (W. Jacks, 14.3 ov), 5-162 (H. Pandya, 17.2 ov), 6-162 (N. Dhir, 17.5 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 1, Wides: 3, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
S. Ahmed 3.0 0 28 0 9.33
. Cummins 4.0 0 26 3 6.5
E. Malinga 4.0 0 36 2 9.0
Z. Ansari 3.1 0 35 0 11.05
H. Patel 3.0 0 31 1 10.33
R. Chahar 1.0 0 9 0 9.0

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to