Mumbai Indians Mumbai Indians
  • l
  • w
  • l
  • w
  • w
121-2 ( 12.5)
121-2 116-10 MUM won by 8 wickets (with ...
Kolkata Knight Riders Knight Riders
  • l
  • l
  • w
  • w
  • l
116-10 ( 16.2)
Started: 02 PM, Mon Mar 31 2025 Indian Premier League Venue: Wankhede Stadium
Prev Mumbai Indians MUM Next
Prev Knight Riders KKR Next

Commentary

  • 0' The match was played in Indian Premier League on Monday March 31.

Knight Riders

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
A. Raghuvanshi c N. Dhir b H. Pandya 26 16 0 3 1 163.0
R. Singh c H. Pandya b M. Santner 22 12 0 1 2 183.0
M. Pandey b A. Kumar 19 14 0 2 1 136.0
R. Singh c N. Dhir b A. Kumar 17 14 0 1 1 121.0
A. Rahane c T. Varma b A. Kumar 11 7 0 1 1 157.0
A. Russell b A. Kumar 5 11 0 1 0 45.0
H. Rana c N. Dhir b V. Puthur 4 8 0 0 0 50.0
V. Iyer c R. Rickelton b D. Chahar 3 9 0 0 0 33.0
Q. Kock c A. Kumar b D. Chahar 1 3 0 0 0 33.0
S. Johnson Not Out 1 3 0 0 0 33.0
S. Narine b T. Boult 0 2 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-2 (Q. Kock, 1.1 ov), 2-25 (A. Rahane, 3.1 ov), 3-41 (V. Iyer, 5.4 ov), 4-45 (A. Raghuvanshi, 6.6 ov), 5-74 (R. Singh, 10.3 ov), 6-80 (M. Pandey, 10.6 ov), 7-88 (A. Russell , 12.4 ov), 8-99 (H. Rana, 14.3 ov), 9-116 (R. Singh, 16.2 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 2, Wides: 4, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
T. Boult 4.0 0 23 1 5.75
D. Chahar 2.0 0 19 2 9.5
A. Kumar 3.0 0 24 4 8.0
H. Pandya 2.0 0 10 1 5.0
V. Puthur 2.0 0 21 1 10.5
M. Santner 3.2 0 17 1 5.1

Mumbai Indians

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
R. Rickelton Not Out 62 41 0 4 5 151.0
S. Yadav Not Out 27 9 0 3 2 300.0
W. Jacks c A. Rahane b A. Russell 16 17 0 0 1 94.0
R. Sharma c H. Rana b A. Russell 13 12 0 0 1 108.0

Fall of wickets: 1-46 (R. Sharma, 5.2 ov), 2-91 (W. Jacks, 10.4 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 0, Wides: 1, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
S. Johnson 2.0 0 14 0 7.0
H. Rana 2.0 0 28 0 14.0
V. Chakravarthy 3.0 0 12 0 4.0
A. Russell 2.5 0 35 2 12.35
S. Narine 3.0 0 32 0 10.67

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to