Zimbabwe National Cricket Team Zimbabwe
  • l
  • l
  • l
  • l
  • w
134-10 ( 18.4)
134-10 234-2 IND won by 100 runs
India National Cricket Team India
  • l
  • l
  • d
  • w
  • l
234-2 ( 20)
Started: 11 AM, Sun Jul 07 2024 Twenty20 Internationals Venue: Harare Sports Club
Prev Zimbabwe ZIM Next
Prev India IND Next

Commentary

  • 0' The match was played in Twenty20 Internationals on Sunday July 7.

India

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
A. Sharma c D. Myers b W. Masakadza 100 47 0 7 8 213.0
R. Gaikwad Not Out 77 47 0 11 1 164.0
R. Singh Not Out 48 22 0 2 5 218.0
S. Gill c B. Bennett b B. Muzarabani 2 4 0 0 0 50.0

Fall of wickets: 1-10 (S. Gill, 1.2 ov), 2-147 (A. Sharma, 13.6 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 0, Wides: 7, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
B. Bennett 2.0 0 22 0 11.0
B. Muzarabani 4.0 1 30 1 7.5
T. Chatara 4.0 0 38 0 9.5
S. Raza 3.0 0 34 0 11.33
L. Jongwe 4.0 0 53 0 13.25
D. Myers 1.0 0 28 0 28.0
W. Masakadza 2.0 0 29 1 14.5

Zimbabwe

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
W. Madhevere b R. Bishnoi 43 39 0 3 1 110.0
L. Jongwe c R. Gaikwad b M. Kumar 33 26 0 4 0 127.0
B. Bennett b M. Kumar 26 9 0 1 3 289.0
J. Campbell c R. Bishnoi b W. Sundar 10 18 0 0 0 56.0
I. Kaia b M. Kumar 4 3 0 1 0 133.0
S. Raza c D. Jurel b A. Khan 4 4 0 1 0 100.0
B. Muzarabani c W. Sundar b A. Khan 2 4 0 0 0 50.0
W. Masakadza Run Out 1 3 0 0 0 33.0
D. Myers c R. Singh b A. Khan 0 1 0 0 0 0.0
C. Madande Lbw Out 0 4 0 0 0 0.0
T. Chatara Not Out 0 2 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-40 (B. Bennett, 2.6 ov), 2-41 (D. Myers, 3.2 ov), 3-46 (S. Raza, 3.6 ov), 4-72 (J. Campbell, 9.4 ov), 5-73 (C. Madande, 10.3 ov), 6-76 (W. Masakadza, 11.1 ov), 7-117 (W. Madhevere, 16.3 ov), 8-123 (B. Muzarabani, 17.4 ov), 9-134 (L. Jongwe, 18.4 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 2, Wides: 8, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
M. Kumar 3.4 0 37 3 10.09
A. Sharma 3.0 0 36 0 12.0
A. Khan 3.0 0 15 3 5.0
R. Bishnoi 4.0 0 11 2 2.75
W. Sundar 4.0 0 28 1 7.0
R. Parag 1.0 0 5 0 5.0

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to