Mumbai Indians Mumbai Indians
  • w
  • w
  • w
  • w
  • w
152-4 ( 13.2)
152-4 149-6 MUM won by 6 wickets
Perth Scorchers Perth Scorchers
  • w
  • l
  • l
  • w
  • l
149-6 ( 20)
Started: 12 AM, Wed Oct 02 2013 Twenty20 Champions League
Prev Mumbai Indians MUM Next
Prev Perth Scorchers PER Next

Commentary

  • 0' The match was played in Twenty20 Champions League on Wednesday October 2.

Perth Scorchers

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
SM Whiteman not out 51 32 45 6 2 159.38
AC Agar b PP Ojha 35 40 37 6 0 87.5
HWR Cartwright b NM Coulter-Nile 28 20 26 4 0 140.0
SM Katich b PP Ojha 13 19 38 0 0 68.42
MJ North c KA Pollard b NM Coulter-Nile 3 7 13 0 0 42.86
TIF Triffitt b R Dhawan 1 2 5 0 0 50.0
JP Behrendorff not out 1 1 1 0 0 100.0
AJ Turner lbw b NM Coulter-Nile 0 1 0 0 0 0.0
JS Paris 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
GB Hogg 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
MA Beer 0 0 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-55 (AC Agar, 9.2 ov), 2-56 (SM Katich, 9.5 ov), 3-114 (HWR Cartwright, 15.3 ov), 4-114 (AJ Turner, 15.4 ov), 5-130 (MJ North, 18.3 ov), 6-143 (TIF Triffitt, 19.3 ov)

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
Harbhajan Singh 4.0 0 31 0 7.75
NM Coulter-Nile 4.0 0 19 3 4.75
R Dhawan 4.0 0 30 1 7.5
KA Pollard 3.0 0 26 0 8.67
GJ Maxwell 3.0 0 14 0 4.67
PP Ojha 2.0 0 17 2 8.5

Mumbai Indians

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
RG Sharma not out 51 24 40 3 4 212.5
DR Smith c JP Behrendorff b GB Hogg 48 25 28 5 3 192.0
KA Pollard b GB Hogg 23 18 28 2 1 127.78
AT Rayudu not out 14 4 3 0 2 350.0
GJ Maxwell c GB Hogg b JP Behrendorff 10 7 5 2 0 142.86
SR Tendulkar c SM Whiteman b JP Behrendorff 0 2 8 0 0 0.0
KD Karthik 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
NM Coulter-Nile 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Harbhajan Singh 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
R Dhawan 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
PP Ojha 0 0 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-16 (SR Tendulkar, 1.6 ov), 2-34 (GJ Maxwell, 3.6 ov), 3-72 (DR Smith, 6.2 ov), 4-137 (KA Pollard, 12.3 ov)

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
MA Beer 4.0 0 34 0 8.5
JP Behrendorff 3.0 0 31 2 10.33
JS Paris 2.0 0 36 0 18.0
GB Hogg 3.0 0 26 2 8.67
AC Agar 1.2 0 23 0 17.25

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to